Weinstein v. Zoning Board of Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a reviewing court “defer[s] to the Board’s resolution of the factual disputes embodied in the evidence presented by each party”
• noting that a reviewing court \defer[s] to the Board's resolution of the factual disputes embodied in the evidence presented by each party\
• granting a variance to construct an addition intruding into the setback area where the lot was small for the neighborhood and the home was functionally obsolete
• board’s determination to grant variances required for addition to home “was not against the manifest - 10 - 1-19-2528 weight of the evidence”
• when hardship exists, the Board’s decision to grant a variation is not against the manifest weight of the evidence even if the objecting party presents an alternate plan that “complie[s] with the zoning ordinances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).