Weingarten Realty Investors v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the merits are not an aspect of arbitrability” and thus denying the motion to stay proceedings
• “An appeal of a denial of a motion to compel arbitration does not involve the merits of the claims pending in the district court.”
• “An appeal of a denial of a motion to compel arbitration does not involve the merits of the claims pending in the district court.”
• “Even given, as we have decided, that there is no automatic stay, the district court had the discretion to grant one.”
• “Because this is merely a private contractual matter … no substantial legal question is involved.”
• “[T]his court determined that the four-factor test [for a stay] must be fully applied except where there is a serious legal question involved and the balance of equities heavily favors a stay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).