· 8/6/1990
Weinert v. Bronco National Co.
Citations
- 795 P.2d 1167
- 58 Wash. App. 692
- 1990 Wash. App. LEXIS 297
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that general contractor did not owe a legal duty to an injured employee of its subcontractor where there was no evidence that the employee's fall occurred in a \common area\ as defined by Kelley
- concluding that general contractor did not owe a legal duty to an injured employee of its subcontractor where there was no evidence that the employee’s fall occurred in a “common area” as defined by Kelley
- duty to comply with safety regulations applies to any party with supervisory authority on a worksite
- duty to comply with safety regulations applies to any party with supervisory authority on a jobsite
- an owner/developer could be liable to all employees because it, like a general contractor, had supervisory authority that gave it sufficient control over the workplace
- duty to comply with safety regulations applies to any party with supervisory authority on a jobsite
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scholfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.