Skip to main content
· 8/6/1990

Weinert v. Bronco National Co.

Citations

  • 795 P.2d 1167
  • 58 Wash. App. 692
  • 1990 Wash. App. LEXIS 297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that general contractor did not owe a legal duty to an injured employee of its subcontractor where there was no evidence that the employee's fall occurred in a \common area\ as defined by Kelley
  • concluding that general contractor did not owe a legal duty to an injured employee of its subcontractor where there was no evidence that the employee’s fall occurred in a “common area” as defined by Kelley
  • duty to comply with safety regulations applies to any party with supervisory authority on a worksite
  • duty to comply with safety regulations applies to any party with supervisory authority on a jobsite
  • an owner/developer could be liable to all employees because it, like a general contractor, had supervisory authority that gave it sufficient control over the workplace
  • duty to comply with safety regulations applies to any party with supervisory authority on a jobsite

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scholfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.