· 5/26/1952
Weiner v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.
Citations
- 343 U.S. 956
- 72 S. Ct. 1051
- 96 L. Ed. 1356
- 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2069
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that dismissal is warranted upon a “clear record of delay or willful contempt and a finding that lesser sanctions would not suffice”
- observing that the district court “would also have been justified in dismissing this action under Rule 16(f) . . . to punish counsel for his disregard of the court’s orders to submit a preliminary statement” after affirming sanction of dismissal
- explaining dismissal with prejudice is considered a “sanction of last resort”
- explaining dismissal with prejudice is considered a “sanction of last resort”
- explaining dismissal with prejudice is considered a “sanction of last resort”
- explaining dismissal with prejudice is considered a “sanction of last resort”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.