Skip to main content
· 5/26/1952

Weiner v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

Citations

  • 343 U.S. 956
  • 72 S. Ct. 1051
  • 96 L. Ed. 1356
  • 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that dismissal is warranted upon a “clear record of delay or willful contempt and a finding that lesser sanctions would not suffice”
  • observing that the district court “would also have been justified in dismissing this action under Rule 16(f) . . . to punish counsel for his disregard of the court’s orders to submit a preliminary statement” after affirming sanction of dismissal
  • explaining dismissal with prejudice is considered a “sanction of last resort”
  • explaining dismissal with prejudice is considered a “sanction of last resort”
  • explaining dismissal with prejudice is considered a “sanction of last resort”
  • explaining dismissal with prejudice is considered a “sanction of last resort”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.