Weinberg v. Hertz Corp.
Citations
- 116 A.D.2d 1
- 499 N.Y.S.2d 693
- 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50360
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding in consumer fraud case that “once it has been determined that the representations alleged are material and actionable, thus warranting certification, the issue of reliance may be presumed, subject to such proof as is required on the trial”
- individual reliance in a class action need not be handled on a case-by-case basis
- “[I]t is notable that in determining whether a class action is superior to other viable methods, it is clear that most of the individuals having claims averaging less than $31 would have no realistic day in court if a class action were not available.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kupferman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court· 2010-03-31· cited 619×
- City of New York v. MaulNew York Court of Appeals· 2010-05-06· cited 368×
- Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-12-01· cited 113×
- Ansoumana v. Gristede's Operating Corp.S.D. New York· 2001-05-24· cited 105×
- Sikes v. Teleline, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2002-02-13· cited 83×
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.C.D. California· 2015-02-23· cited 74×
- Super Glue Corp. v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-07-13· cited 65×
- Deloitte & Touche LLP v. Fourteenth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court· 1997-10-02· cited 60×
- Pruitt v. Rockefeller Center Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-05-21· cited 60×
- Pludeman v. Northern Leasing Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-06-01· cited 57×
- Woodrow v. Colt Industries Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1991-01-08· cited 56×
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.N.D. California· 2018-03-15· cited 51×
- Sumitomo Copper Litigation v. Credit Lyonnais Rouse, Ltd.Second Circuit· 2001-08-15· cited 46×
- Dupler v. Costco Wholesale Corp.E.D. New York· 2008-01-31· cited 46×
- Pesantez v. Boyle Environmental Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-06-02· cited 45×
- Woodrow v. Colt Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-04-03· cited 31×
- Globe Surgical Supply v. GEICO InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2008-12-30· cited 30×
- Klein v. Robert's American Gourmet Food, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-01-31· cited 29×
- Godwin Realty Associates v. CATV Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-08-24· cited 28×
- Broder v. MBNA Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-03-29· cited 28×
Other cases named Weinberg v. Hertz Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.