Weinberg v. Hertz Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in consumer fraud case that “once it has been determined that the representations alleged are material and actionable, thus warranting certification, the issue of reliance may be presumed, subject to such proof as is required on the trial”
• individual reliance in a class action need not be handled on a case-by-case basis
• “[I]t is notable that in determining whether a class action is superior to other viable methods, it is clear that most of the individuals having claims averaging less than $31 would have no realistic day in court if a class action were not available.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).