Weinberg v. Gibstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Colorado law and holding that PLA precluded claims of negligent training and supervision filed against movie theater’s owner
• applying Colorado law and holding the CPLA precludes claims of negligent training and supervision filed against movie theater’s owner
• applying Colorado law and concluding that the CPLA precludes claims for negligent training and supervision against landowner
• identifying danger of criminal activities known to occur at or near theater with no alarms, no door locks, and no security personnel present in 2012 Aurora shooting case
• “the judge shall determine whether the plaintiff is a trespasser, licensee or invitee . . . [but] issues of liability and damages in any such action shall be determined by the jury” (quoting Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13–21–115(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).