Weill & Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the HCQIA does not require “peer review proceedings to look like regular trials in a court of law”
• explaining that the HCQIA does not require “peer review proceedings to look like regular trials in a court of law”
• noting that sanctions cannot be avoided by the “empty head, pure heart” 9 defense
• stating the HCQIA does not require “peer review proceedings to look like regular trials in a court of law”
• suggesting 24 that the \reasonableness\ requirements of HCQIA may be addressed through a motion for summary judgment
• noting § 11112(b) safe harbors are sufficient but not necessary to obtain HCQIA immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).