Weiler, A. T. v. Stroud Twp. ZHB

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing between a “fact already obvious from . . . testimony at trial” and evidence that provides “new ammunition” the latter increasing the chances of prejudicial error
• “When a fact was already obvious from . . . testimony at trial and the evidence in question would not have provided any new ammunition, an error is likely to be harmless.”
• interpreting a prior version of MRE 414

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).