Weil v. Frauenthal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding reversal not necessary on basis that board member should have disqualified himself from participating in the decision because it was not alleged that member controlled or unduly influenced other board members on their votes
• board member disqualified because he had been employed by the applicant and testified on the applicant’s behalf
• where a board member was disqualified because he had been employed by the applicant and had testified on the applicants behalf
• board member disqualified because he had been employed by the applicant and testified on the applicant’s behalf
• board member disqualified because he had been employed by the applicant and testified on the applicant’s behalf
• board member disqualified because he had been employed by the applicant and testified on the applicant’s behalf

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).