Weil v. Connecticut Fire Ins.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the essence” of the plaintiffs’ claims “sound in tort and therefore do not fall within [the court’s] Tucker Act jurisdiction”
• finding that “the essence” of plaintiffs’ claims “sound in tort and therefore do not fall within [the court’s] Tucker Act jurisdiction”
• precluding plaintiffs claim against the Small Business Administration based upon preclusive effect of prior suit asserted against the United States Coast Guard
• all requiring amendment of complaint if claim arising out of the same transaction is capable of being asserted prior to decision being rendered
• claim appears “to fall within the common law principles of misrepresentation or inducement which are clearly tortious in nature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).