Weihl v. Asbestos Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where trial court implicitly or explicitly rejects invitation to go beyond scope of pleadings at summary judgment stage, appellate court will not treat pleadings as implicitly amended to conform to the evidence
• where trial court implicitly or explicitly rejects invitation to go beyond scope of pleadings at summary judgment stage, appellate court will not treat pleadings as implicitly amended to conform to the evidence
• “it would have been within the trial court’s discretion, in ruling on a motion under ORCP 21 D, to require plaintiff to plead” with reasonable particularity any alleged exposures to asbestos- containing products

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McKenzie v. A. W. Chesterson Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-20· cited 8×
• Dayton v. Jordan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-10· cited 7×
• Fischer v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-11-16· cited 5×
• Greer v. ACE Hardware Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-04-10· cited 3×
• Bohr v. Tillamook County Creamery Association
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-01

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hussey v. Huntsinger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-03-06· cited 17×
• Mittleman Properties v. Bank of California
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-14· cited 12×
• Permapost Products Co. v. Osmose, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-07-27· cited 8×
• Federal Savings & Loan Ins. Corp. v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-06-14· cited 4×
• Marineau v. A. P. Green Refractories Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-09-28· cited 1×