Skip to main content
· 4/11/2002

Weidner v. Midcon Corp.

Citations

  • 767 N.E.2d 815
  • 328 Ill. App. 3d 1056
  • 263 Ill. Dec. 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The test to be applied in determining whether the trial court’s discretion was properly exercised is whether the allowance of the amendment would further the ends of justice.”
  • trial court's denial of motion to reconsider was proper because proponents presented no new evidence that was not available when court ruled on prior motion, nor did they raise claim of change in law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rarick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.