Weidner Communications, Inc. v. H.R.H. Prince Bandar Al Faisal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in order to state a claim for conspiracy under section 1983, a 9 plaintiff must allege “specific facts to support the existence of the claimed conspiracy”
• concluding that “[plaintiff’s] claims against all the defendants for a conspiracy to violate his constitutional rights under section 1983 . . . fail because they were supported only by conclusory allegations”
• affirming summary judgment where plaintiff failed to state specific facts to support existence of claimed conspiracy to violate constitutional rights under § 1983
• to state claim for conspiracy to 7 violate constitutional rights, plaintiff must state specific facts to support existence of claimed 8 conspiracy
• plaintiff must allege specific facts to support claim of 1 conspiracy to violate constitutional rights
• plaintiff must allege specific facts to support claim of conspiracy to violate 14 constitutional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).