Skip to main content
· 11/15/1915

Weidmann Silk Dyeing Co. v. East Jersey Water Co.

Citations

  • 88 N.J.L. 400
  • 3 Gummere 400
  • 96 A. 1103
  • 1915 N.J. LEXIS 346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that party had no clear entitlement to ruling on recusal motion before judge decided whether to approve compromise that would end dispute and thus moot recusal issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.