Weick v. Dougherty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding defendant’s arguments for a dismissal based on class action allegations “better suited as challenges to a motion for class certification, rather than a basis for a motion to dismiss”
• “The 30–day grace period prescribed under 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200(d)(3) does not apply to a violation of 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200(c)(2)
• “To state a claim under section 227(c)(5) of the TCPA, a plaintiff must allege (1) receipt of more than one telephone call within any 12-month period (2) by or on behalf of the same entity (3) in violation of the regulations promulgated by the FCC.”
• characterizing the provision as a “30–day grace period”
• all concluding that it was Section 227(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).