Weible v. Allied Signal, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he nexus between an asbestos product and plaintiff may be established by direct and circumstantial evidence,” and that testimony by someone “with knowledge relating to the plaintiff’s workplace exposure to an asbestos-containing product is admissible”
• permitting appeal where trial court order declaring case settled as to all remaining parties rendered prior grants of summary judgment final for purposes of appeal
• permitting an appeal where a trial court order, which declared a case settled as to all remaining parties, had rendered prior grants of summary judgment final for purposes of appeal
• permitting appeal where the trial court order, declaring the case settled as to all remaining parties, rendered prior grants of summary judgment to the non- settling parties final for purposes of appeal
• permitting appeal where the trial court order, declaring the case settled as to all remaining parties, rendered prior grants of summary judgment to the non- settling parties final for purposes of appeal
• reversing grant of summary judgment where the product identification witnesses in that case demonstrated an ability to call up specific recollection of the brake and clutch products at issue and where co-workers testified that they used the asbestos-containing products

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).