Wei Hua Xia v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even if [debtors] had a contractual claim to the D&O Proceeds, that claim would be subject to the D&O Policies’ priority of payment 15 provision.”
• “By limiting their requests to the D & O Policies, the Individual Insureds have advanced compelling arguments that the proceeds should not be subject to further bankruptcy court oversight or limitation.”
• “[I]t appears that the D & O proceeds are not property of the MFGI or MFGH Debtors’ estates, except for the $13.06 million related to [potential indemnification claims against the MF Global estates].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).