Wegman v. Pratt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• involving the issue of whether a party’s subpoenaing of the presiding judge to testify of “irrelevant matters” warranted dismissal of relevant count under Rule 219(c)
• intentional act of shooting could also constitute negligence in determining proper amount of force to use in self-defense
• although defendant admitted striking plaintiff intentionally, trial court improperly dismissed plaintiffs negligence claim in assault and battery action because self-defense can be pleaded in negligence action
• “An order of sanctions that is just within the meaning of Rule 219 is one that provides both for discovery and for trial on the merits”
• intentional act of shooting could also constitute negligence in determining proper amount of force to use in self-defense
• \An order of sanctions that is just within the meaning of Rule 219 is one that provides both for discovery and for trial on the merits\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).