Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/4/2020
Wegman v. Ashton
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 4330
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting a civil stalking protection order. Taking every unwanted action by appellant into consideration, appellee established by a preponderance of the evidence that appellant engaged in conduct constituting menacing by stalking. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- Smith v. WunschOhio Court of Appeals· 2005-06-28· cited 58×
- Lewis v. JacobsOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-09· cited 14×
- Taylor v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-26· cited 8×
- Howard v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-03-19· cited 7×
- Sweet v. HuntOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-21· cited 4×
- Tax Ease Ohio, L.L.C. v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.