Wegele v. Ismert-Hincke Milling Co.

Citations

• 105 Kan. 615
• 186 P. 130
• 1919 Kan. LEXIS 141

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Workmen’s Compensation Act — New Election Not to Accept it Necessary after Its Revision. For the reasons set out in the opinion in Railway Co. v. Fuller, ante, p. 608, which was argued and submitted to- . gether with this case, it is held that under the law as it now exists all employers of five or more workmen, engaged in industries characterized by the statute as especially dangerous, are subject to the compensation system, except where notice to the contrary has been given subsequent to the adoption of the act of 1917 in relation thereto, irrespective of what may have been done before that time.</p>