Weems v. County Commissioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the terminal point of the easement was located by a call, the easement was specifically located, and the court’s interpretation of the parties’ intent was confined to the four corners of the granting instrument
• discussing an individual’s right to compensation “for the taking of ... [a] ‘stick’ from [his or her] bundle of rights”
• “The Supreme Court has remained consistent in asserting that included amongst a property owner’s ‘bundle of rights’ is the right to exclude others.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).