Weeber v. Boyd (In Re Boyd)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs reliance was not justifiable because he had “special knowledge” of the risks associated with lending the debtor money
• \[D]ischarge exceptions to debts resulting from actual fraud...implement the long-standing policy that only those debts which are honestly incurred are entitled to the benefits of a bankruptcy discharge.\
• an embezzlement claim requires a “specific intent to actually do harm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).