Weddel v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an interlocutory order is one that does not dispose of all of the controversy between the parties
• stating that an interlocutory order is one that does not dispose of all of the controversy between the parties
• stating that the denial of a motion to dismiss is an interlocutory order which “may be modified or revised by a successor court at any time prior to final judgment”
• “An interlocutory order is one that does not dispose of all of the controversy between the parties.”
• appellate court’s denial of motion to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction was interlocutory and, therefore, not subject to the law-of-the-case doctrine
• \An interlocutory order is one that does not dispose of all of the controversy between the parties.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).