Skip to main content
· 11/24/1995

Wecker v. TBL Excavating, Inc.

Citations

  • 908 P.2d 1186
  • 19 Brief Times Rptr. 1668
  • 1995 Colo. App. LEXIS 327
  • 1995 WL 694781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[E]vidence is not substantial if it . . . constitutes a mere 4 conclusion.”
  • “[E]vidence is not substantial if it . . . constitutes a mere conclusion.”
  • “[E]vidence is not substantial if it . . . constitutes a mere conclusion.”
  • “[E]vidence is not substantial if it . . . constitutes a mere conclusion.”
  • mere conclusions don’t constitute substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davidson, Casebolt, Roy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.