Webster v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no due diligence as a matter of law when evidence showed plaintiffs actions over four months were not designed to procure the issuance and service of citation
• finding no diligence as a matter of law when plaintiff made efforts at service, but they were careless and not persistent
• finding lack of diligence in part because of counsel’s mistake or negligence in sending citation to wrong precinct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).