Webster v. Motorola, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that any nexus between the plaintiffs job responsibilities and risk of harm to human health and safety were “attenuated”
• finding that employer’s interest in drug testing of plaintiff employee to prevent harm to human health and national security outweighed his individual privacy interests
• holding a corporation’s legitimate business interest in ensuring that an employee not operate a motor vehicle while intoxicated by drugs outweighs the employee’s privacy interests under the Privacy Act
• explaining that the relevant privacy interest in employment drug test cases is 1
• balancing interests of employer in screening employees against the bodily intrusion of a urinalysis test
• evaluating MPA claim where employer required employees to submit to a urinalysis for drugs by balancing employer’s legitimate business interests with employees’ privacy interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).