Webster v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a state motion was not properly filed if the state dismissed it as untimely
• holding that even properly filed state court petitions must be pending in order to toll the limitations period
• holding that state petition must meet state filing deadlines to toll federal habeas statute of limitations
• holding that a state post-conviction motion filed after expiration of the limitations period cannot toll the period, because there is no period remaining to be tolled
• holding that a state post-conviction motion filed after expiration of the limitations period cannot toll the period, because there is no period remaining to be tolled
• holding that “a state-court petition . . . that is filed following the expiration of the limitations period cannot toll that period because there is no period remaining to be tolled”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).