Webster v. Hartman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]his court has long held that in order to support a claim of error on appeal the appellant has the burden to present a sufficiently complete record”
• noting that, absent a complete record, reviewing courts “will presume that the trial court heard adequate evidence to support its decision”
• noting that based on the nature of an appeal, the court of review must have the record before it in order to determine whether there is the error claimed by the appellant
• noting that “[t]his court has long held that in order to support a claim of error on appeal the appellant has the burden to present a sufficiently complete record”
• noting that based on the nature of an appeal, the court of review must have the record before it in order to determine whether there is the error claimed by the appellant
• affirming appellate court’s holding that where basis for trial court’s decision is unknown, a reviewing court presumes adequate evidence and conformity with law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).