Webster v. Dow United Technologies Composite Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A defendant can ‘intelligently ascertain’ notice of the requisites of remova- bility from either formal or informal ‘papers/_”
• “[I]nterrogatory answers have generally been recognized as ‘other papers’ sufficient to trigger the running of the thirty day period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).