Skip to main content
· 9/17/1993

Webster v. Aust

Citations

  • 628 So. 2d 846
  • 1993 WL 356845

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a check does not satisfy the Statute of Frauds when it does not disclose the full terms of the contract, the specific dates of the closing, the payment of the balance, and the mutuality of the agreement and is not a final expression of the parties' agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thigpen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.