Webster v. Abbott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding where ALJ rejected as an improper disability determination treating source’s medical assessment of claimant’s inability to reach overhead and lift certain weights
• “[T]he ALJ seemed to accept that [claimant] suffered fatigue and sleepiness during the day because she said that her residual functional capacity finding was ‘sufficient to address claims of fatigue[,]’” but “[o]ne can only guess why that is.”
• “[T]he ALJ seemed to accept that [claimant] suffered fatigue and sleepiness during the day because she said that her residual functional capacity finding was ‘sufficient to address claims of fatigue[,]’” but “[o]ne can only guess why that is.”
• \not entirely consistent\ language alone not enough to require remand
• “[T]he ALJ seemed to accept that Mr. Lopez suffered fatigue and sleepiness during the day because she said that her residual functional capacity finding was ‘sufficient to address claims of fatigue . . .’ One can only guess why that is.”
• “[T]he ALJ seemed to accept that Mr. Lopez suffered fatigue and sleepiness during the day because she said that her residual functional capacity finding was ‘sufficient to address claims of fatigue . . .’ One can only guess why that is.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).