Weber v. Sentry Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he expression of specific things in a contract implies the exclusion of all not expressed.”
• “The well-recognized rule of ‘expressio unius est exclusio alterius’ provides that the expression of specific things in a contract implies the exclusion of all not expressed.”
• “The well-recognized rule of ‘expressio unius est exclusio alterius’ provides that the expression of specific things in a contract implies the exclusion of all not expressed.” (citing Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 84 N.W.2d 593, 599 (Minn. 1957))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).