Skip to main content
· 11/13/1995

Weber v. Langholz

Citations

  • 39 Cal. App. 4th 1578
  • 46 Cal. Rptr. 2d 677
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8748
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 15088
  • 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 1106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the trial court did not lack substantial evidence for an attorney fees award even though there were no time records or billing statements
  • noting that the trial court did not lack substantial evidence for an attorney fees award even though there were no time records or billing statements
  • noting that the trial court did not lack substantial evidence for an attorney fees award even though there were no time records or billing statements
  • noting that the trial court did not lack substantial evidence for an attorney fees award even though there were no time records or billing statements
  • analyzing whether TILA applied to a transaction with a revocable living trust, but ultimately not deciding the issue because the transaction was indisputably for business purposes, not consumer purposes, and therefore not subject to TILA
  • action was “on a contract” where defendant sought rescission of a loan under the Federal Truth in Lending Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vogel (c.S.)

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.