· 11/13/1995
Weber v. Langholz
Citations
- 39 Cal. App. 4th 1578
- 46 Cal. Rptr. 2d 677
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8748
- 95 Daily Journal DAR 15088
- 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 1106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the trial court did not lack substantial evidence for an attorney fees award even though there were no time records or billing statements
- noting that the trial court did not lack substantial evidence for an attorney fees award even though there were no time records or billing statements
- noting that the trial court did not lack substantial evidence for an attorney fees award even though there were no time records or billing statements
- noting that the trial court did not lack substantial evidence for an attorney fees award even though there were no time records or billing statements
- analyzing whether TILA applied to a transaction with a revocable living trust, but ultimately not deciding the issue because the transaction was indisputably for business purposes, not consumer purposes, and therefore not subject to TILA
- action was “on a contract” where defendant sought rescission of a loan under the Federal Truth in Lending Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vogel (c.S.)
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.