Weber v. Jolly Hotels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “exercising [general] jurisdiction over a defendant who merely advertises its services or product on the Internet would violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment”
• “[A]dvertising on the Internet is not tantamount to directing activity at or to purposefully availing oneself of a particular forum.”
• comparing internet advertising to advertising in a national magazine and noting that internet advertising “is not tantamount to directing activity at or to purposefully availing oneself of a particular forum”
• applying analysis to claims that both specific and general jurisdiction existed
• comparing internet advertising to advertising in a national magazine and noting that internet advertising A is not tantamount to directing activity at or to purposefully availing oneself of a particular forum @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).