Weber v. Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that design defect claim against the Infuse Device was preempted
• holding that the plaintiffs’ design-defect claim was preempted
• dismissing the plaintiffs’ manufacturing and design defect claims as 25 preempted by Section 360k
• “[A] plaintiff’s choice of 20 forum is entitled to less deference if he is not a citizen of the forum.”
• “[A] plaintiff’s choice of 20 forum is entitled to less deference if he is not a citizen of the forum.”
• “Plaintiffs have pled facts 25 sufficient to satisfy Rule 9(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).