· 1/15/2009
Weber v. Finker
Citations
- 554 F.3d 1379
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 1145
- 2009 WL 91807
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that district courts act well within their discretion under § 1782(a) when they “order discovery pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”
- holding that a party waived its argument that § 1782 motions are dispositive by failing to timely object to referral of the motion to the magistrate judge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilson, Cox, Albritton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.