Skip to main content
· 1/15/2009

Weber v. Finker

Citations

  • 554 F.3d 1379
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 1145
  • 2009 WL 91807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district courts act well within their discretion under § 1782(a) when they “order discovery pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”
  • holding that a party waived its argument that § 1782 motions are dispositive by failing to timely object to referral of the motion to the magistrate judge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilson, Cox, Albritton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.