Skip to main content
· 5/4/1903

Weber v. Aschbacker

Citations

  • 205 Pa. 558
  • 55 A. 534
  • 1903 Pa. LEXIS 615

Syllabus

<p>Fraudulent conveyance — Execution—Evidence—Question for jury.</p> <p>The defendant in a pending suit purchased real estate and took title in his wife’s name. Two months after a verdict against him, he and his wife conveyed the land to athird person. An action of ejectment was brought by the plaintiff against the grantee to recover the property after purchasing it at sheriff’s sale as the property of the defendant. The evidence tended to show that the property had been taken in the name of the wife in order that the defendant in the execution might not lose it, “if anything happened to him,” and that the conveyance to the defendant in the ejectment was without consideration, and under an agreement that the property should be given back. Held that the case was for the jury.</p>

Judges: Brown, Dean, Mestrezat, Mitchell, Potter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.