Skip to main content
· 4/28/2000

Weber, Calvin J. v. United States

Citations

  • 209 F.3d 756
  • 341 U.S. App. D.C. 128
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8268
  • 2000 WL 390438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “An employee who believes he has been the victim of a prohibited personnel practice must first complain to the OSC....”
  • “But even if the OSC’s investigation does not support the complaint, the employee still may bring an individual action before the MSPB.”
  • “[M]andamus is proper only when an agency has a clearly established duty to act.”
  • “Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy whose issuance is guided by equitable principles.”
  • “[M]andamus is proper only when an agency has a clearly established duty to act.”
  • “mandamus is proper only when an agency has a clearly established duty to act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Silberman, Randolph, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.