Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. Beckwith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that funds deposited in interpleader fund for benefit of creditors are the property of creditors
• holding that States may not, “by ipse dixit, . . . transform private property into public property without compensation”
• holding that the state’s confiscation of the interest accrued on interpleader funds was a consti tutional taking
• holding that the state's confiscation of the interest accrued on interpleader funds was a constitutional taking
• holding that interpleader funds deposited with a court clerk are subject to the \interest follows principal\ rule
• holding that interpleader funds deposited with a court clerk are subject to the “interest follows principal” rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).