Webber v. Vogel
Citations
- 159 Pa. 235
- 28 A. 226
- 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1501
Syllabus
<p>Deeds — Grant of coal — Right of way — Mines and mining.</p> <p>Where a deed conveys “all the merchantable coal lying and being” within certain boundaries, with “ the free and uninterrupted right of way for the purpose of digging, mining and carrying away the said coal,” the grantee in the deed, or his successor in title, has no right to take through the pit, or over the surface of the tract, coal from an adjoining tract owned by him.</p> <p>In such a case where the mining privileges are expressly restricted to the coal conveyed, the fact, that both tracts were formerly owned by one person, who used a visible road or way over the surface of the coal conveyed to transport coal from the other tract, does not entitle the grantee in the deed to such right of way.</p> <p>Such a case is not governed by the rule that, where an easement or servitude is imposed by the owner on one portion of his real estate for the benefit of another, a purchaser of it at a private or judicial sale, without an express reservation, takes the property subject to the easement or servitude.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding, in a case where the asserted concurrent employer had ceased doing business approximately six months prior to the work injury, that receipt of unemployment compensation does not constitute concurrent compensation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dean, Green, Mitchell, Sterrett, Thompson, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.