Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 9/29/2000

Webb v. Webb

Citations

780 So. 2d 698
2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 595
2000 WL 1451196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that a petition to modify based on anticipated future events is speculative and should be filed after the change in circumstances has occurred
reversing a judgment modifying alimony , citing Taylor and the \last judgment\ formulation, but nonetheless considering evidence of circumstances prior to the last judgment, in which both parties' requests to modify alimony were denied
reversing a judgment modifying alimony , citing Taylor and the \last judgment\ formulation, but nonetheless considering evidence of circumstances prior to the last judgment, in which both parties' requests to modify alimony were denied
although stating that a court determining whether to modify alimony may consider circumstances since the entry of the most recent judgment, the trial court and this court considered evidence back to the date of the original alimony award
although stating that a court determining whether to modify alimony may consider circumstances since the entry of the most recent judgment, the trial court and this court considered evidence back to the date of the original alimony award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Monroe, Robertson, Yates, Crawley, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.