Webb v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s direct knowledge that anesthesiologists regularly falsely coded their procedures for billing purposes was sufficient to satisfy Rule 9(b)
• noting that “including particularized factual allegations that give rise to a plausible inference of fraud” can suffice under Rule 9(b)
• finding that FCA claim based on the knowing use of incorrect billing codes was sufficiently alleged
• “[A]lleging fraud ‘on information and belief’ is normally insufficient to satisfy Rule 9(b)’s heightened pleading standard.”
• “This more rigorous pleading standard guards against the stigmatic injury that potentially results from allegations of fraud.”
• “This more rigorous pleading standard guards against the stigmatic injury that potentially results from allegations of fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).