Webb v. Nashville Area Habitat for Humanity, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a motion to dismiss is only proper when the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of its claims
• noting that “federal judicial decisions ‘interpreting rules similar to our own are persuasive authority for purposes of construing the Tennessee rule.’”
• noting that the amendment is applicable to causes of action accruing on or after June 10, 2011
• explaining that on a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff is entitled to “the benefit of all reasonable inferences”
• observing that “Tennessee follows a liberal notice pleading standard, which recognizes that the primary purpose of pleadings is to provide notice of the issues presented to the opposing party and court” (citation omitted)
• observing that “Tennessee follows a liberal notice pleading standard, which recognizes that the primary purpose of pleadings is to provide notice of the issues presented to the oppos ing party and court” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).