Webb v. Jeffries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Such a review, we believe, comes within [§ 4165’s] broad mandate, .to ensure that the grant program is being conducted in accordance with NA-HASDA.” (citing § 4165(b)(l)(A)(i)(II)
• “Such a review, we believe, comes within [§ 4165’s] broad mandate to ensure that the grant program is being conducted in accordance with NAHASDA.” (citing § 4165(b)(1)(A)(i)(II))
• “Such a review, we believe, comes within [§ 4165’s] broad mandate to ensure that the grant program is being conducted in accordance with NA-HASDA.” (citing § 4165(b)(l)(A)(i)(II))
• “Because we conclude that [25 U.S.C. § 4165] applies in the instant case, we further conclude that HUD was not free to disregard the requirements of that section in favor of a common law remedy with no apparent rules or limitations.”
• “Because we conclude that [25 U.S.C. § 4165] 'applies in the instant case, we further conclude that HUD was not free to disregard the requirements of that section in favor of a common law remedy with no apparent rules or limitations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).