Webb v. Dunn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding device serial number was not PII where recipient could use “aggregated data to ‘personally identify . . . users and associate their video viewing selections with a personalized profile in its databases’” (citation omitted)
• describing a Facebook ID as “equivalent to a name—it stands in for a specific person”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).