Webb v. Annucci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the statute’s use of “relatively precise terms” and the need to use “the words of the statute” as “the courts’ principal referent in determining whether the section has been violated”
• “[T]he use of a wide range of economic sanctions is proscribed by § 8(b)(4)(ii).”
• no subcontracting clause an invalid work preservation clause because “union [sought] to restrict by contract ... an employer with respect to the products he uses, for the purpose of acquiring for its members work that had not previously been theirs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).