Webb v. Angell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• long form instruction inappropriate since no evidence supported patient’s allegations that other physicians and hospital personnel failed to properly diagnose and treat her
• cross-examination precluded even where malpractice suit then pending against the expert involved the “same issue,” thus having the potential to expose his bias toward a certain result
• noting the requirements for foundation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).