Weaver v. State, Department of Motor Vehicles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that this court need not consider issues raised for the first time in an appellant’s reply brief
• concluding that a police officer had a reasonable belief that the appellant was intoxicated at the time of the accident where he “smelled strongly of alcohol, had watery bloodshot eyes, and slurred his speech when he spoke”
• stating that this court need not consider issues raised for the first time in an appellant's reply brief
• stating that this court need not consider issues raised for the first time in an appellant's reply brief
• providing that this court need not consider issues raised for the first time in an appellant's reply brief
• providing that issues raised for the first time in an appellant's reply brief need not be considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).