Court of Appeals of Texas· 3/25/1982
Weaver v. State
Citations
- 652 S.W.2d 420
- 1982 Tex. App. LEXIS 5660
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Regardless, appellant may not raise this issue on appeal since he did not request an additional peremptory challenge after exhaustion 43 of his original ten challenges to use on a second juror, whose presence he alleged to be objectionable.”
- “Regardless, appellant may not raise this issue on appeal since he did not request an additional peremptory challenge after exhaustion 43 of his original ten challenges to use on a second juror, whose presence he alleged to be objectionable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Duggan, Dyess, Warren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Adami v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-06-25· cited 85×
- Tigrett v. PointerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1978-12-29· cited 59×
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-09-19· cited 57×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-02-04· cited 51×
- Shappley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-10-09· cited 49×
- Peters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-01-10· cited 30×
- Ex Parte BurkettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-02-21· cited 22×
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-02-13· cited 14×
- Birchfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1966-03-16· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.