Skip to main content

Weaver v. State

Citations

  • 265 S.W.3d 523
  • 2008 WL 2548807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that officer's stating that defendant had his \whole life ahead of him\ or referring to his drug use were not so influential as to cause him to speak untruthfully
  • deciding that officers’ misrepresentations, during the accused’s interrogation, that (1) witnesses saw him commit the crime, (2) his fingerprints were found, and (3) a videotape showed his involvement in the crime, did not make the accused’s statement involuntary
  • “However, the trial court, as judge of demeanor and credibility, could have chosen to not believe appellant’s unsubstantiated testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuchia, Hanks, Higley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.